$1.5 Billion Stolen, Largest Hack in Crypto History, Was Multi-Sig Also Compromised?
Bybit Hacked for $1.5 Billion, Potentially the Largest Crypto Hack in History, Surpassing 2022's Axie Hack Record. The recent hack has caused significant panic in the market, with ETH experiencing a short but sharp price fluctuation, although not to the extent of the FTX run on bank in the past.
Ironically, many investors had just recovered partial compensation from FTX's bankruptcy settlement. "After 2.5 years, finally received compensation from FTX and deposited it into Bybit, only to have Bybit's hot wallet hacked the next day," became the most widely circulated dark joke overnight, casting a shadow over the crypto industry once again.
Late Night Hack
On February 21 at 23:00, crypto influencer Finish posted that according to on-chain data, a multi-sig address belonging to Bybit transferred $1.5 billion worth of ETH to a new address.

The funds landed at the new address 0x47666fab8bd0ac7003bce3f5c3585383f09486e2, then moved to 0xa4b2fd68593b6f34e51cb9edb66e71c1b4ab449e, where 0xa4 is currently selling stETH and mETH for ETH.
"The address is currently using 4 different DEXs. If they just convert sETH back to native ETH, the slippage would be massive. This scale of conversion is typically done OTC, so this is very unusual."

Half an hour later, Bybit CEO Ben Zhou stated that the ETH multi-sig cold wallet faced a sophisticated attack, with the smart contract logic tampered with, allowing the hacker to control a specific wallet and move all ETH. He mentioned that other cold wallets are secure, withdrawals are functioning normally, and efforts are being made to track the stolen funds. He also said, "We will go live very soon to address all questions! Stay tuned."
Related Article: "Timeline: Bybit Hacked for Over 500,000 ETH, Losing $1.5 Billion"
The Largest Hack in History?
According to EmberCN monitoring, Bybit's ETH multisig cold wallet was hacked, with 514,000 ETH stolen, valued at 1.429 billion USD. The hacker has already dispersed 490,000 ETH to 49 addresses (10,000 ETH per address). "Additionally, 15,000 cmETH is currently being unstaked by the hacker (with an 8-hour unbonding period, it's unknown whether this can be intercepted)."
Based on CoinMarketCap data, Bybit had $16.2 billion in reserves before the hack, with the stolen $1.4 billion assets accounting for 8.64%. This may be the largest amount ever stolen in crypto history, accounting for 16% of all previous crypto hacks. The previous largest cryptocurrency theft in history was the Ronin Network (Axie Infinity) hack on March 29, 2022. The hacker stole approximately $620 to $625 million in cryptocurrency, including 173,600 ETH and $25.5 million USDC.

Following the news of the Bybit hack, ETH plummeted to the $2600 range.

Only the ETH cold wallet was targeted by the hacker; Bybit's hot wallet, warm wallet, and all other cold wallets were unaffected. According to community feedback, all withdrawals are processing normally within 20 minutes.
Some community members also inquired ChatGPT and Grok about Bybit's annual revenue and profit estimates. Both came up with similar calculations: annual revenue around $20 billion and annual profit around $6 billion.

"Bybit still has the ability to pay, and even if the losses from this hack cannot be recovered, all customer assets remain 1:1 backed, and we can cover this loss." These words from Bybit's co-founder added a sense of credibility.
Was the Hack Due to the Multisig Wallet Being Safe?
On February 22, SlowMist founder Cao Yun published a post stating that the Bybit hacking technique is similar to that of North Korean hackers, "Although there is no clear evidence at the moment, from the Safe multi-signature technique and the current money laundering technique, it looks like North Korean hackers."
At the same time, the founder of DefiLlama pointed out that the attack method is similar to the WazirX hack related to North Korea. Stay vigilant.

At 23:44, in an announcement by Bybit's co-founder and CEO Ben Zhou, it was revealed: "Bybit's ETH multi-signature cold wallet was transferred to our hot wallet about 1 hour ago. It appears that this transaction was disguised, all signers saw a fake interface showing the correct address and the URL was from Safe."
However, the signature information was to change the logic of their ETH cold wallet's smart contract. This allowed the hacker to control their signed specific ETH cold wallet and transfer all the ETH in the wallet to this unconfirmed address.
Further investigation by SlowMist revealed more details of the vulnerability:
1) A malicious implementation contract was deployed on UTC 2025-02-19 7:15:23:
https://etherscan.io/address/0xbdd077f651ebe7f7b3ce16fe5f2b025be2969516…
2) On UTC 2025-02-21 14:13:35, the attacker utilized a three-owner signature transaction to replace Safe's implementation contract with a malicious contract:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x46deef0f52e3a983b67abf4714448a41dd7ffd6d32d32da69d62081c68ad7882…
3) The attacker then used the backdoor functions "sweepETH" and "sweepERC20" in the malicious contract to steal from the hot wallet.

This technique bears some similarities to the Radiant Capital hack in October 2024:
At that time, a security vulnerability at Radiant Capital resulted in the theft of around $50 million. The attackers used malware to infect at least three core developers' devices, all long-trusted DAO contributors who used hardware wallets for transactions. The hackers manipulated the front end interface of Safe{Wallet} (i.e., Gnosis Safe), causing the victims to mistakenly believe they were signing off on legitimate transactions when, in fact, malicious transactions were being executed in the background.
The attack involved implanting highly sophisticated malware on the developers' devices, inadvertently leading them to approve the hackers' malicious operations when signing transactions. The Safe{Wallet} front end did not display any anomalies, making the victims unaware of the transaction tampering. The hackers exploited common transaction failures (such as gas fee fluctuations, sync delays, etc.) to induce developers to resign multiple times, thereby obtaining multiple valid malicious signatures. Despite simulations and audits of the transactions using tools like Tenderly, the malware's manipulation of the developers' devices caused all checks to return normal results, delaying the timely detection of the attack.
Related Reading: "Radiant Capital Post-Mortem"
All fingers seem to point to the Safe multisig wallet.
Safe is the most widely used multisignature wallet in the Ethereum ecosystem, primarily used by large holders. During Safe's token distribution earlier this year, almost all of the top 100 airdrop addresses belonged to project teams or institutions, including OP, Polymarket, Drukula, Worldcoin, Lido, and more. Related Reading: "A Comprehensive Overview of Safe's Trading, Tokenomics, and Ecosystem"

Initially, Safe's audience consisted more of DAOs and cryptocurrency projects. However, as the crypto industry entered the next stage, traditional finance, institutions, family funds, and old money began to enter the market. An increasing number of traditional institutions, such as the Dung Wang family, are also starting to use the multisig wallet Safe.
The design of Safe has greatly improved the security of fund management. Through a multi-signature mechanism, funds are stored in a smart contract address, and a transaction can only be executed when the preset number of signatures is met (e.g., 3/10). This mechanism effectively reduces the risk of a single point of failure; even if a signature address's private key is leaked, an attacker would find it challenging to obtain enough signatures to complete a transaction.
Currently, the Safe security team has stated, "There is no evidence of the official Safe frontend being compromised. However, as a precautionary measure, Safe{Wallet} has temporarily suspended certain functions." They are closely collaborating with Bybit for an ongoing investigation.

Some community members have initiated mockery of Safe: multi-signature is just a decoration for "closing the eyes and stealing the bell." At the same time, many industry practitioners have expressed reflection and concerns about the industry: "If even multi-signature wallets are not secure, then who will take this industry seriously?"|
The investigation into the current event is still ongoing, and the rhythm BlockBeats will continue to follow up.
You may also like

Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?

Binance Research: RWA Market Expected to Expand Nearly 6x from Early 2025, with Public Equities and Onchain Payments Heating Up Together
In June, Binance Research said in its monthly market report that the real-world asset (RWA) market is expected to grow by about 589% from the beginning of 2025. Bond- and money market fund-related RWA expanded by about $6.5 billion, up 83% year over year, while publicly traded equity RWAs grew by about 422%. The report also noted that monthly crypto debit card transaction volume exceeded $747 million in May, up 48.6% year to date.

Japan to Assess a Framework for Yen Stablecoins and Crypto ETFs as Asia’s Compliant Payments Narrative Heats Up
Recently, according to the original report, Japan is considering the launch of yen stablecoins and cryptocurrency ETFs. Public information remains limited at this stage, and there is still no complete policy text, regulatory draft, or clear implementation timeline, so this is better characterized as a “policy discussion” rather than formal implementation. The original wording also noted that advancing stablecoin regulation in Asia is driving XRP usage and supporting growth in the XRPL ecosystem. However, based on currently available public information, there is not enough evidence to directly establish a clear causal relationship between this round of discussion in Japan and XRP or XRPL.

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery
Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?
Binance Research: RWA Market Expected to Expand Nearly 6x from Early 2025, with Public Equities and Onchain Payments Heating Up Together
In June, Binance Research said in its monthly market report that the real-world asset (RWA) market is expected to grow by about 589% from the beginning of 2025. Bond- and money market fund-related RWA expanded by about $6.5 billion, up 83% year over year, while publicly traded equity RWAs grew by about 422%. The report also noted that monthly crypto debit card transaction volume exceeded $747 million in May, up 48.6% year to date.
Japan to Assess a Framework for Yen Stablecoins and Crypto ETFs as Asia’s Compliant Payments Narrative Heats Up
Recently, according to the original report, Japan is considering the launch of yen stablecoins and cryptocurrency ETFs. Public information remains limited at this stage, and there is still no complete policy text, regulatory draft, or clear implementation timeline, so this is better characterized as a “policy discussion” rather than formal implementation. The original wording also noted that advancing stablecoin regulation in Asia is driving XRP usage and supporting growth in the XRPL ecosystem. However, based on currently available public information, there is not enough evidence to directly establish a clear causal relationship between this round of discussion in Japan and XRP or XRPL.
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.



