Jupiter Token Buyback Controversy, Vitalik's 2026 Vision, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
Publication Date: January 4, 2025
Author: BlockBeats Editorial Team
Over the past 24 hours, the crypto market has displayed a trend of parallel evolution across multiple dimensions. Mainstream discussions have focused on a reevaluation of the token buyback mechanism's effectiveness, defining protocol actual revenue, and the discussion of Ethereum's long-term scalability roadmap; in terms of ecosystem development, Solana has explicitly shifted towards a "utility and privacy" narrative, community-friendly ICOs have garnered attention, and Perp DEX race competition has intensified.
I. Mainstream Topics
1. Discussion on Halting Token Buybacks
Controversy Surrounding Jupiter's Halting of Token Buybacks
Jupiter Exchange founder Siong initiated a discussion on X proposing to halt the JUP token's buyback plan. Over the past year, Jupiter has allocated over $70 million to buybacks, but the token price has seen little substantial improvement. Siong believes that these funds should be redirected towards user growth incentives, such as new user subsidies, active user rewards, to drive ecosystem scalability.
This proposal quickly drew community attention and sparked discussions with other projects (such as Helium halting HNT buybacks), gradually evolving into an industry-level reflection on "whether the buyback mechanism is still effective."
Community feedback has been highly polarized, but the majority of views do not advocate for "completely abandoning buybacks" but rather call for more structural reforms.
Anatoly Yakovenko (Toly) proposed converting profits into future claimable assets and rewarding long-term holders through a one-year staking incentive to extend the fund's life cycle and strengthen token value anchoring. Some users also suggested providing staking incentives in stablecoin form (e.g., USDC, 25% APY) to try to reduce short-term selling pressure. Opponents pointed out that the root cause of price weakness is team unlocks and continuous selling, rather than inadequate buyback efficiency. Jordi Alexander and others further proposed introducing a dynamic buyback model based on the PE ratio to avoid "buying high and inefficiently consuming" during high valuation stages.
Overall, the consensus gradually forming in the community is that buybacks themselves are not ineffective, but their effectiveness is severely diluted in a structure where tokens and equities are highly misaligned and selling pressure persists. Some are concerned that halting buybacks will accelerate price declines, but more voices believe that, compared to defensive bottoming out, prioritizing growth is a more realistic path forward.
HNT Buyback Suspension Discussion
Helium founder Amir announced the suspension of HNT token buybacks, citing the market's "almost no response" to the project's buyback actions.
Helium and Helium Mobile collectively generated about $3.4 million in revenue in October, but Amir stated that rather than continuing buybacks seen as "ineffective consumption," he prefers to invest the funds in user growth, including expanding the mobile user base, increasing network coverage, and promoting carrier offload usage. It is important to note that Helium's Data Credits continue to burn to support network offload demand, but the token buyback itself has been temporarily put on hold until market conditions improve.
There is a clear community split. Individuals like Foobar criticized this decision as equivalent to admitting a "lack of revenue sharing with token holders" and questioned the project's long-term commitment. Some also suggested exploring revenue sharing or dividend mechanisms to enhance holding incentives, but Amir responded that such designs face practical hurdles at the regulatory level. Supporters, on the other hand, believe that using funds for real growth instead of "throwing into a black hole" is more practical.
Some users pointed out that tokens from projects like DePIN are often seen by the market as "usage tokens" rather than equity instruments, leading to their long-term systemic undervaluation; buybacks are only likely to be effective when there is virtually no selling pressure, otherwise, they are more of a short-term "optical effect." This discussion is also frequently juxtaposed with Jupiter's proposal, becoming a typical case of "buyback mechanism failure in a bear market."
Does "Solana Culture" Render Buybacks Ineffective?
In the Jupiter and HNT buyback dispute, user Stoic Savage put forward a more radical view, suggesting that the issue lies not in the buyback itself but in a structural flaw in the Solana ecosystem. He described Solana as a highly "internalized" ecosystem, with internal transactions, team unlocks, and extractive tokenomics continuing to offset any positive impact buybacks might bring.
This view has resonated strongly in the community, with many agreeing that the Solana ecosystem has long-term issues of "moral bankruptcy" and "insider prioritization," making buybacks almost doomed to fail in such an environment. However, some users oppose simply attributing buyback failures to the mechanism itself, pointing out that Solana's issues stem more from high emissions, frequent unlocks, and team sells, rather than inherently invalid buyback logic. Individuals like Wow Im Farming criticized that some founders turning to the buyback narrative are just masking deeper token design flaws.
The overall sentiment is leaning towards pessimism, with some users starting to use ecosystems like Hyperliquid as a benchmark, emphasizing that "repurchases can only have real value in the absence of structural selling pressure."
2. Controversy Over DEX Revenue Data Comparison
Hayden Adams publicly criticized Aerodrome's revenue data as misleading: Aerodrome categorizes 100% of LP fees as "protocol revenue," then returns it to LPs through token emissions, greatly inflating recorded income. The data shows that Aerodrome reported approximately $4.34 billion in "revenue" last year, but during the same period, it needed to pay about $8 billion in incentive costs.
In contrast, Uniswap adopts a more conservative strategy, only extracting a small amount of protocol fees (about $60,000 daily on average), emphasizing long-term sustainability rather than short-term optical numbers. Tervelix refers to Aerodrome's revenue as an "illusion," pointing out that it is closer to gross revenue, while Uniswap is more like a net profit model, and LP earnings come directly from real fees rather than token dilution.
Supporters of Aerodrome counter that Uniswap Labs itself relies on approximately $120 million in token emissions to sustain operations, essentially diluting holders as well; while also noting that Uniswap had significant early investments and has been in a "high-cost, low-revenue" state for a long time.
The Uniswap camp emphasizes that its model is closer to infrastructure logic, where LPs can receive returns without relying on subsidies, suitable for long-term existence; while Aerodrome is more like "TVL leasing," which may face rapid liquidity depletion once incentives stop.
The overall consensus is gradually becoming clear:
Aerodrome is more "friendly" to current holders, but inflation and incentive dependence pose significant risks;
Uniswap has a slower growth pace, but the model is closer to long-term infrastructure.
The discussion then expanded to include other DEXs like Meteora, Jupiter, raising more questions about fee metrics and the definition of "real income."
3. Vitalik's Outlook for 2026
Vitalik Buterin released a lengthy New Year post, reviewing Ethereum's key developments in 2025, including gas limit increases, zkEVM performance breakthroughs, and PeerDAS's improvements to data availability. However, he also emphasized that Ethereum still needs to continue advancing in terms of usability and decentralization.
Vitalik once again positions Ethereum as the "world computer," with its core goal being to build an application ecosystem that is trustless, censorship-resistant, and free from third-party intervention. He emphasizes the importance of privacy protection and "walkaway resilience" (i.e., the system's ability to continue running even if developers disappear). He describes Ethereum as a "rebellion" against the subscription platform trend, focusing on serving the infrastructure layer of finance, identity, and governance.
The community's response has been positive. Gabriel Shapiro and others express gratitude to Vitalik for upholding cypherpunk values; the Milady meme resurfaces once again as a cultural response.
However, there are differing views, with Richard Heart taking the opportunity to promote PulseChain and emphasize the decentralized advantages of a standalone chain. There are also discussions pointing out that chains like ICP have potential in terms of "on-chain applications."
Some users note that Ethereum's success is also attributed to the cultural and liquidity foundation brought by meme assets (such as $PEPE). The overall sentiment is optimistic, but there are also calls to further promote decentralization at the application layer, especially in terms of front-end censorship resistance. Figures like Rip.eth once again summarize, stating, "Ethereum fundamentally remains a rebellion."
II. Mainstream Ecosystem Updates
Solana: 2026 Ecosystem Focus
The Solana team releases the 2026 Solana Ecosystem Outlook, clearly shifting the growth focus from speculation to utility-driven development. The report highlights upcoming upgrades, record-breaking stablecoin and RWA adoption, inflows of ETF-related funds, and a series of catalysts stacking up.
The core narrative is broken down into six directions:
1. Payments and Stablecoins: USDC, PYUSD, etc., focusing on cross-border remittances and e-commerce payments
2. RWA Tokenization: Involvement of institutions like Ondo Finance, BlackRock, emphasizing compliance and institutional capital
3. AI Oracles and DeFi: Nosana, io.net, supporting low-latency AI inference and compute scheduling
4. Privacy Infrastructure: Arcium, Umbra, building privacy capabilities through ZK and confidential computing
5. Prediction Markets: Kalshi, Drift, serving as real-time information infrastructure
6.x402 Micro Payment Protocol: Proposed by Coinbase for programmatic and machine payments
Overall Goal Clear: Propel Solana from "transaction- and speculation-driven" to "executable application-oriented network," positioning 2026 as the execution year.
Community widely acknowledges this pragmatic approach. Users like cryptod0n see privacy as the core narrative for 2026, forming a clear "privacy stack" around projects like Arcium, Magicblock, and others. Discussions also extend to cross-chain interoperability (e.g., Base-Solana via Chainlink connection), seen as potentially introducing billions of dollars in DeFi liquidity.
Overall sentiment tends toward optimism. Some users (e.g., ray) look back on 2025 achievements—stablecoin supply growing to around $16 billion, Visa settlement implementation—and consider 2026 more as continuity than a reversal. Privacy-related projects receive the most interaction, with ZeraLabs, Nulltrace, and others being continuously added. The emerging consensus is that Solana is transitioning from the "fastest chain" to the "private and practical chain." A few voices remind of unresolved structural issues like high emissions, but this does not affect the overall bullish view.
MetaDAO's New ICO: Ranger Finance
MetaDAO announces its latest ICO project, Ranger Finance, will take place on January 6–10, 2026, with a fundraising target of $6–8 million.
The token distribution structure emphasizes "user-first": ICO allocates 39.02 million RNGR tokens (39.02% of total supply), with 100% unlock at TGE; team and investor TGE with 0% unlock, setting an 18-month lockup period and 2x–32x price milestones; ambassadors with 50% TGE unlock, the remainder released linearly over 6 months; Ranger Points holders have an exclusive allocation pool; excess funds used for 90-day buy wall support; Ranger positioned as the DeFi command center, integrating cross-chain liquidity, automated strategies, and cross-chain execution capability. This ICO also marks MetaDAO's first handling of projects with existing VC funding background.
Market feedback significantly leans positive. Individuals like sacha believe this structure strikes a balance between fundraising efficiency and holder trust, with the founding team rated as "S-tier." Discussions focus on two key advantages: public before VC and team unlock, and priority for points holders.
Some users (like Bumblebee) anticipate a significant oversubscription, drawing parallels to the previous MetaDAO project, believing the total commitment amount could approach or even exceed $100 million; Polymarket-related bets are active. A few concerns focus on the token distribution mechanism and the token's actual utility, but the overall consensus is that this ICO has set a new benchmark for community-friendly launches, with MetaDAO seen as a representative of the "ownership supercycle."
Privacy Projects on Solana
Solana Sensei releases the 2026 privacy narrative outlook, outlining the landscape of privacy projects on Solana, covering various aspects such as communication, transactions, payments, and computation, including Arcium, Umbra, Magicblock, Nulltrace, PrivacyCash, Offgridcash, etc.
The report emphasizes that privacy is shifting from a niche feature to a default attribute, with ZK and secure computation becoming long-term moats.
The community response is highly concentrated, with privacy widely seen as the most deterministic narrative thread for Solana in 2026. Fitzy regards ZeraLabs as a potential major entry point, while Moonwave Master highlights Beldex's infrastructure-level privacy capabilities.
The main divide lies in "native privacy chain vs. layered privacy modules." Some users prefer plug-and-play shielded transaction solutions, while others value system-level anonymity tools like Nulltrace, IP isolation, etc. The overall consensus is shifting towards Solana moving from the criticized "internalized ecosystem" towards a "privacy-by-default" technical trajectory. Although a few are concerned about the "dark web label," the mainstream view is that this is a demand-driven inevitability.
Ethereum: Vitalik on ZK-EVM and PeerDAS
Vitalik Buterin posts an article systematically explaining the combination of ZK-EVM (Alpha stage, performance close to production but still needing security work) and PeerDAS (already live on the mainnet), aimed at steering Ethereum towards a high-bandwidth, decentralized consensus execution network.
He views this solution as a breakthrough for the "trilemma," transitioning from Bitcoin's low-bandwidth strong consensus, BitTorrent's high-bandwidth weak consensus to a combination of the two.
The roadmap includes:
2026: ZK-EVM Node Operation, Gas Limit Increase
2026–2028: Gas Repricing and State Structure Adjustment
2027–2030: Further Scalability, ZK-EVM as Primary Validation Mechanism
Emphasis is placed on building a distributed blockchain to reduce centralization interference and enhance geographic fairness.
Community sentiment is overwhelmingly positive. Nikolai Kotsofane sees this as a paradigm shift from a "settlement layer" to an "execution network." Discussions center around PeerDAS improving data capacity and the synergy of reducing redundant computations with ZK-EVM.
Optimists believe DeFi and blockchain games may undergo structural changes, but they stress that security remains a key constraint. Some are also concerned about the speed of blockchain decentralization. The overall consensus is that this marks a significant milestone in the ten-year roadmap, and 2026–2030 will be Ethereum's comprehensive expansion period.
Ethena DAT: S-4 Amendment
On December 29, Ethena DAT submitted the S-4 Amendment. The filing reveals that despite ENA enjoying a roughly 30% discount in the token purchase agreement, the structure will ultimately exit the SPAC, and most ENA tokens will remain in an unrealized loss position during the vesting period over the next few years.
Community feedback is notably negative. smac bluntly states "uh oh," D2 Finance criticizes the weak PIPE signal, suggesting that SPAC promoters focus more on transaction completion rather than long-term quality. Discussions revolve around the complexity of accounting rules (related-party transactions triggering GAAP impairment) and insufficient structural transparency. Some users question the former Celsius CFO's management background.
The overall assessment is that the structure is complex, compounded by regulatory and accounting constraints, making the risk significantly skewed to the downside. While some suggest supplementing with non-standard metrics like mNAV, there is general concern that retail investors may find them hard to understand, leading to an overall bearish sentiment.
Perp DEX: Extended Short-term Revenue Surpasses Lighter
Blur data shows that Extended briefly surpassed Lighter in 24-hour revenue and set a new high of around $2 billion in perpetual contract trading volume. Since its launch in December 2024, its 24-hour trading volume has risen to about $14 billion, with a TVL of $133 million and $197 million in open interest. Meanwhile, Variational has accumulated a total trading volume of $26 billion, with $646 million in open interest during the same period.
Market sentiment is leaning towards euphoria. Laxo believes it is still "undervalued," lyonzzzz emphasizes multiple ATHs such as trading volume, OI, TVL, fees, etc., and believes that the season incentives have not yet kicked in. The overall assessment is: Extended and Variational are emerging as the core players of the new generation Perp DEX, with a few users comparing them to Hyperliquid and Aster, seeing Extended as having more long-term potential.
Others: MegaETH 2025 Investor Memo
MegaETH co-founder released the 2025 Investor Memo, reviewing progress from seed round to testnet, raising approximately $1.5 billion, and launching Fluffle, Echo, and the public sale mechanism. Technological highlights include real-time EVM, around 100,000 TPS, and sub-millisecond latency.
The 2026 plan includes the mainnet launch, TGE, and expanding real-time applications in gaming and DeFi, while continuing to emphasize transparency and community first.
Overall feedback is positive. Users generally acknowledge its long-term communication and introspection, believing that 2026 will be the year of MegaETH mainnet acceleration and application realization; test experience sharing is mainly focused on sub-10ms latency and production-level performance.
You may also like

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds
Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.
White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.
