Several Projects Rug Pull 2 Billion? Insider Reveals How Kelsier Ventures Pulled It Off
On January 31, Argentine President Milei posted a tweet on his X account stating, "He is providing me with advice on the impact and application of blockchain technology and artificial intelligence in the country," accompanied by a photo of himself with a young man in a suit wearing gold-rimmed glasses.
This person is Hayden Mark Davis, a key figure in the LIBRA token issuance controversy.

Who Is Hayden Mark Davis?
Hayden Mark Davis' LinkedIn profile indicates that since October 2020, he has been the CEO of Kelsier; since May of the same year, he has been the founder of Luxury Drip, a company of unknown industry (although there is an Italian brand of the same name in the urban fashion field); and according to Davis, he has been an entrepreneur since August 2017, running a company called Leaders Elevate. A Google search of this latter company leads to a result linking to a coaching-focused company founded by another individual named Tom Davis based in Barcelona.
Hayden Mark Davis' personal account still fails to reveal his story. The last photo was uploaded from the presidential palace by Javier Milei, while another one dates back to February 2022, showing the young man alongside several other individuals named Davis, with their names annotated. Thomas Davis and Gideon Davis appear as the CEO and co-founder of Kelsier, respectively. Currently, this account has been locked as a private account.

Former team members of Kelsier Ventures found through a web page snapshot
Unveiling Kelsier Ventures' Operations
The following content is from an investigative video by Nick O'Neil, CEO of BoDoggos Entertainment:
In this video, I want to delve deeper into Kelsier Ventures, who are still actively providing token issuance services to date, despite one of their founders, Hayden, currently facing risks and being embroiled in an international scandal. What I learned today is how Kelsier conducts the entire process of token issuance, including fees, the company's involvement in money laundering, token washing, and issues such as internal control for friends and family. Next, I will switch to the computer screen to showcase my understanding of Kelsier Ventures and their current modus operandi, dissecting the four key components of Kelsier Ventures step by step.
Shipping
I interacted with a team member to understand their actual fees and operational process. Firstly, Kelsier Ventures is still actively running, and Hayden is currently at an undisclosed location, although I roughly know where he is, I don't want to disclose that information.
Today I received a quote from the team, and their core business model still seems to be operating discreetly. You will soon see what I mean by the "launch and drain" process, designed to extract as much money as possible from their token. When you pay for their service, they will discuss how to deploy shuffling and target "sniping." Later on, I will delve into the fee structure, but essentially, they want this whole process to be untraceable and will engage in "money laundering" during the inflow and outflow.
Some may call it wire fraud; I don't know how they themselves would define it, leaving it to the judicial system to judge. But from my understanding, it's basically that.
They will also conduct market-making after token issuance and provide various options. These include short-term operations, the most famous being Melania, as well as long-term market-making, which requires them to use 20% of the token. The "shuffling" process I mentioned earlier is done in these operations, extracting funds from them.
Pricing
Next, let's look at pricing. In fact, the price is quite standard. If you have had contact with market makers in this field, you will know this is very straightforward. They will charge a 2% token share and plan to sell these tokens in the future.
I saw in a recently leaked internal video that this rate could be 1%. In fact, they may allocate this 2% share to different people, but in any case, they are charging this 2% token share and planning to settle a maximum of 1.1% daily. That is, if you provide a 2% token share and the service period is 20 days.
Calculating based on a daily service fee of $3000, or based on the amount you withdraw at 20%. If you ask them to sell $1 million today, then they will charge a 20% service fee, which is $200,000. So the fee structure is based on a higher amount.
However, there is also a part that is the cost of initiating these operations, which is a chart they use internally and provide to clients, this is today's latest pricing.

I'm not going to delve into it here as it's not important, but I'll give you an example. Let's say you want to set the token's market cap at $1 million and plan to conduct a 94% token "shuffle." They usually execute this "shuffle" operation at each issuance, with the ratio typically ranging from 85% to 97%. If you look at the issuance of the Melania token, you'll find that it falls within this range. In this way, they are actually getting in early before the market officially opens, essentially "front-running" all other buyers.
Using a $1 million market cap as an example, suppose you spend 333.33 Sol today to kick off this process. That's 333.33 multiplied by $180, totaling $60,000, plus 20 Sol as an initial cost, along with other expenses, resulting in a final cost of $63,500.
Why choose a higher market pricing? It may be because there is high demand, and they want to start at a high price. Of course, for some small projects, the market pricing is lower. However, for larger projects like Trump Token, Melania Coin, and others, the price will be higher, and their pre-shuffle ratio will be greater.
From my point of view, this practice is almost tantamount to illegal, but that's their structure. I suggest you take a deeper look at this chart to understand how they operate.
Finally, I want to mention a key point, and I'll further elaborate on it in the video. According to my sources, 90% of the "snipers" come from within Kelshear. They distribute tokens to friends or set up operations for their bots. Although I can't confirm this, it seems to be the way they operate, which is simply absurd.
As I said, they are still continuing these practices. The entire system operates on the basis of money laundering, presale sniping, market making, short-term typical "pump and dump" schemes (like the Melania token), followed by long-term market making. As mentioned in the conversation between Hayden and Dave Portnoy, they will eventually use the money they earn to buy back tokens and ultimately "dump" them on the market.
You may also like

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds
Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market
Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle
Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."
$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage
Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.




